Saturday, October 18, 2014

Antonio's Anime Roundup #2



Though I originally planned to have this post up much sooner than, I'm finally back with another roundup of anime.  I started this recurring feature as a way of getting back into anime, an art form I was never too much of an expert on in the first place, but one that I had especially abandoned in recent years.  At this point, I'd consider myself a full-fledged anime fan.  Admittedly, there's much more chaff than wheat, but when you stumble across a series that's really good, watching it can be a uniquely rewarding experience.  This time around, I've once again watched and reviewed five different anime.  It's an interesting mix of shows from the most recent summer season, acclaimed shows from the last few years, and a series from over a decade ago.

Friday, October 17, 2014

Pilot Talk 2014: Week 5 of Fall's TV Pilots



Every TV season, networks bring out a new crop of shows, in hopes that they'll be the next big hit.  Pilot Talk is devoted to figuring out whether these shows are worth your time based on the first episode.

The Affair (Showtime, Sundays at 10:00 PM)
There's no way to describe The Affair without it sounding prosaic, so I'm just going to skip the premise.  In fact, can I skip talking about plot altogether?  Just take my word for it when I say that this is by far the best pilot of the fall (to me, the gap between an A- and a B+ is wider than other gaps).  The show comes from Sarah Treem and Hagai Levi, both of whom had a hand in HBO's In Treatment.  We don't talk about this enough, but In Treatment might be the most structurally daring shows of the past decade, and you'll be happy to know that The Affair has ambitions of its own. I didn't know much beyond a simple logline going into the pilot, so the series of upheavals that occur near the middle of the episode left me absolutely giddy.  The show is deeply invested in the nitty-gritty of truth, memory, and perception; and the process of unpacking the motivations of its characters is fascinating.  In doing so, it also implicates the viewer, causing them to question their own worldview as well.  I'm holding back on giving this a full A only because the pilot hints at the show possibly going in a direction that I'm not crazy about, but if it can avoid that pitfall, this is going to end up being something special.
Grade: A-

Jane the Virgin (CW, Mondays at 9:00 PM)
In order to enjoy Jane the Virgin, it's necessary to get past its silly premise.  Jane (Gina Rodriguez) is, well, a religious virgin who gets pregnant when she's accidentally artificially inseminated with the sperm of Rafeal (Justin Baldoni), a wealthy man who also happens to be her boss.  Not only is that setup horribly convoluted, but the moment of the insemination is even more goofy and illogical.  However, the show has a playful enough tone that it's easy to just roll with it.  Once that's out of the way, there's more than enough to enjoy about this pilot.  Above all else, there's Gina Rodriguez, who is spectacular and incredibly likable as Jane.  She's part of the reason why the show works as well as it does, able to play the comedic and heartfelt moments with equal aplomb.  It's also refreshing to have a show that depicts faith and virginity in a non-judgmental way.  Where lesser shows would be satisfied with a sex-negative worldview, Jane the Virgin chooses to have more nuance.  Jane isn't against sex -- one of the most interesting scenes implies that she and her boyfriend have had phone sex before -- she just has a different set of values that inform her decision to not engage in it until marriage.  So instead of the show's central question being "how long will Jane remain a virgin?," it asks bigger and better ones like, "how will Jane deal with this freak occurrence that happened to her"?  There may be one or two too many complications added to the mix, like Jane's fiancee having some sort of secret that his brother is threatening to uncover, or Rafael's wife being evil and scheming.  But otherwise, Jane the Virgin is a sweet, earnest, and funny little show.
Grade: B

Marry Me (NBC, Tuesdays at 9:00 PM)
Marry Me is about Annie (Casey Wilson) and Jake (Ken Marino), a long-term couple who are stumbling through their engagement period after a series of botched proposal attempts.  But here's the thing about Marry Me: It will not be about that for very long.  That's just one of the symptoms of a show from creator David Caspe.  After all, remember when Happy Endings started off as a show about how Alex left Dave at the altar on the day of their wedding, and then it moved away from that as quickly as possible?  As it stands now, the show is torn between its limiting premise and the hangout show it so clearly wants to be.  From a comedy standpoint, the softer NBC romcom style in the vein of A to Z is wrestling with the "fusillade of jokes" style that Caspe is known for.  There is some vintage Happy Endings gold in the pilot ("Ugh, I'm sweating like Shaq!"), but overall it's much more low-key.  That's a recurring theme of the episode, the feeling that the show is holding itself back.  For example, Ken Marino is one of the funniest comedic actors out there, but he's mostly relegated to playing the beleaguered straight man.  Still, this pilot is solid and charming, if a little flabby and shapeless.  Marry Me will almost certainly be one of the funniest network sitcoms on television if it lasts long enough, but it's just not there yet.
Grade: B-


Well, that concludes the fall round of Pilot Talk!  There are still some new shows slated to premiere (Constantine, The McCarthys, State of Affairs, Ascension), and I'll cover some of them, but they're spread out enough that there won't be any roundups of a week's worth of pilots until midseason.  Let's see the total tally of grades from the last five weeks.

A's: 1
B's: 9
C's: 8
D's: 4
F's: 1

Just for kicks, I looked at the tally from last year, and...it's nearly identical.  (Fall 2013's tally: A's = 1, B's = 9, C's = 8, D's = 3, F's = 2.)  Though I felt like I had become a much harsher grader this year, apparently that's not the case.  Overall, I'd call this a pretty solid fall.  There are a few shows that I've decided to keep watching based on the quality of their pilots, and a few shows whose pilots I didn't like as much that have greatly improved (be on the lookout for my "Selfie is the Greatest Show of All Time" thinkpiece).  I wouldn't be able to tell you whether or not something as torturous as The Mysteries of Laura was has gotten any better though.

Like last year, I'm incredibly burnt out from watching and reviewing all these pilots and I never want to do this again.  Somehow, though, I know I'm going to talk myself into it all over again in 2015.  Either way, I'm glad I can get back to writing about other things in the meantime.

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Pilot Talk 2014: Week 4 of Fall's TV Pilots



Every TV season, networks bring out a new crop of shows, in hopes that they'll be the next big hit.  Pilot Talk is devoted to figuring out whether these shows are worth your time based on the first episode.

Cristela (ABC, Fridays at 8:30 PM)
Cristela bears a few superficial similarities to a couple of other comedies premiering this fall.  Like Mulaney, it's a multi-camera sitcom based around the personality of a popular stand-up comedian.  Though I'm not familiar as familiar with Cristela Alonzo as I am with John Mulaney, her big, infectious personality makes a strong impression in this pilot.  And like Black-ish, the show has a distinct cultural identity, which proves to be its greatest asset.  Many of the show's best jokes are centered around Cristela and her family's status as Mexican-Americans, the joys and difficulties that come with it.  It's too bad, then, that the comedy falls flat in so many other respects.  Many of the jokes are too easy, too similar.  There just aren't many surprises when it comes to the comedy, with every other joke falling back on the same structure of somebody saying, "[statement]" and another character, usually Cristela, responding with, "No actually, [exact opposite statement]."  The multi-camera format lends itself well to the theatricality of the show, but also contributes to those problems with its obviousness.  Cristela is a flawed show, for sure, but it's easy to see it falling into a solid, comfortable rhythm just as its lead-in Last Man Standing did.
Grade: C+

The Flash (CW, Tuesdays at 8:00 PM)
The CW's latest effort in superhero programming, The Flash, has the benefit of built-in goodwill from its sister series, Arrow.  In the latter's second season, we were introduced to Barry Allen (Grant Gustin), a bright-eyed forensics analyst from Central City, but better known as the guy who would eventually become The Flash.  There are even a few moments in the pilot of The Flash that we already saw in Arrow, depicting the catastrophic event that led to Barry getting his gift of super speed.  The first 10 to 15 minutes of this episode blaze through the origin story, often clumsily.  It's saddled with not-so-great voice-over, forced exposition that sets up his relationship with best friend Iris (Candice Patton), and an overall sense of familiarity.  Thankfully, things get much better after they're able to move past that, cutting to nine months later when Barry wakes up from his coma.  So much joy and wonder is infused in the scenes of Barry's discovery of his powers -- something that many superhero shows are lacking.  All of this is very goofy, no doubt, but deliberately so.  It certainly embraces its inherent comic book sensibility with greater success than Gotham, that's for sure.
Grade: B

Mulaney (Fox, Sundays at 9:30 PM)
I feel like now is as good of a time as ever to introduce a concept that I like to call "negative laughter."  It's the idea that bad jokes actually take away laughter, so that when a good joke comes around, you're not even in the mood to respond accordingly because you still have a bad taste in your mouth.  Mulaney's pilot has good jokes -- albeit very few -- but the episode builds up so much negative laughter that you'd be hard pressed to find the energy to enjoy the funny moments.  At this stage, the show is just way too broad, with hacky jokes and characters who amount to nothing more than vaguely offensive stereotypes.  Sitcoms are always more of a work in progress than dramas, so the show will most likely become funnier, but Mulaney has a bigger problem: its titular star.  John Mulaney simply can't act.  Multi-cam comedy requires a bit more of a heightened delivery, but Mulaney's style is just stilted and uncomfortable.  He's a funny guy, and I like his stand-up, but even those portions of the pilot don't work.  They're mostly just setups for more thin plotlines.  Surely, this is the most disappointing new show of the fall so far.
Grade: D+

Sunday, October 5, 2014

Unpacking the wild and brilliant Gone Girl



I have a weird love-hate relationship with the David Fincher films I've seen.  The Social Network and Seven are both excellent, Zodiac is pretty good, Panic Room is fine, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is mediocre.  But Fight Club?  Fight Club is a piece of garbage, and I hate it so much that it brings down my overall opinion of his oeuvre.  (It certainly doesn't help that many people my age consider Fight Club one of their favorite films of all time, which just baffles me.)  There's something about his cold, precise style that makes his work hard for me to fully embrace.  Even his best material, I respect it more than I love it.

To me, his films work best when he's paired with a screenwriter whose dialogue can liven up his sometimes suffocatingly clinical technique.  It's no surprise, then, that the high point of his career so far is the Aaron Sorkin-penned The Social Network.  Sorkin is another auteur whose trademarks aren't always for me, but his union with Fincher managed to cancel out each other's worst impulses.  The former's crackling, volleying dialogue is exactly what was needed to make the latter's directing less sterile.

Gillian Flynn seems to be another perfect fit for Fincher, if Gone Girl is any indication.  Adapting from her own 2012 novel, Flynn's script may not be Sorkin-level, but it's clever in its own right.  It finds a lively way to tell the dark story of the crumbling marriage between Nick Dunne (Ben Affleck) and Amy Elliot-Dunne (Rosamund Pike).  On the morning of their five anniversary, Nick goes to the bar he owns and comes back home to find a glass table shattered on the floor and his wife missing.  When the police begin to investigate her disappearance, they find an envelope in her underwear drawer with "Clue One" scrawled on it, the first stop on a complicated and mysterious paper trail.

Assigned Narratives
In the process of showing us this investigation of Amy Dunne's disappearance, Gone Girl examines how events like these cause the media to assign narratives onto others.  As soon as Amy's case becomes public, Nick's neighbors are quick to treat him like a minor hero, the doting husband.  But the media is willing to villainize him just as quickly.  Everybody over-analyzes and projects their own issues onto Nick's actions, criticizing him for not reacting in the way that they want him to.  The ease with which the consensus sways from one opinion to the other is telling of the hivemind mentality that the 24-hour news cycle fosters.

But the movie also plays well to our own readiness to jump to conclusions.  The moment we find out Nick has been cheating on Amy with a former student (Emily Ratajkowski, of "Blurred Lines" fame), we're supposed to react with a, "yes, of course"!  That's how eager we are to think of men as the wrongdoers in these scenarios.  (And, to our credit, most of the time that's the correct assumption.)  Likewise, when the tables are turned and it's revealed that this is all a part of Amy's effort to frame Nick for her murder, it taps into our competing desire to think of women as vindictive harridans.  Society, Gone Girl posits, is so determined to find types in our stories -- the loving husband, the lying husband, the cheating husband, the perfect wife, the crazy wife, the creepy rapist -- that we'll settle for an approximation and fill in the blanks on our own.

Not even Amy and Nick are above this obsession with narratives, which is fitting, since they both are writers.  In the flashbacks we see of their relationship, they're constantly talking wanting or not wanting to be "the kind of couple that..."  in their fights.  "You're making me be the kind of nagging wife I hate," Amy says at one point, desperate to not fit a type she's seen over and over.  And who can blame her?  One the most important pieces of backstory we get in the film is that her parents became famous from their Amazing Amy collection, a popular series of books inspired by events in their own daughter's life.  Amazing Amy grows up as real Amy does, Amazing Amy gets a dog when real Amy requests one, Amazing Amy even gets married before real Amy does.  All of Amy's life has been foregrounded by a narrative trajectory she can never quite match.

Dark Comedy In a Thriller's Clothing
Though they may be divided into separate subgenres, Seven, Panic Room, Zodiac, and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo can all be considered thrillers.  Clearly, Fincher has a penchant for that mode of storytelling.  It's not out of left field to assume that Gone Girl would be a thriller as well, and there's certainly a great deal of that in there, all of which is done exquisitely.  New twists and turns are unlocked with the elegance and panache of a master, and there are sequences where several moving pieces come together with dizzying results.

But if you view the film as solely being a mystery thriller, you run the risk of being disappointed with its absolutely dotty third act.  Amy's plan shifts and wrinkles in ways that come off as goofy if you take come at them with a straight face.  If you're looking for a conventional resolution to the story, then what we actually get may be a step or two too far.

However, Gone Girl is actually a pitch black comedy.  The first humorous line or character might strike as comedic relief in a mystery thriller.  But then you realize that almost every element of the film is a co-conspirator in this hilarious, insane work of art.  The detectives working the case becoming popcorn-munching audience surrogates, Flynn's floral dialogue, Casey Wilson's over-the-top pregnant character, the way Atticus Ross & Trent Reznor's score swells during the flashbacks of Amy and Nick, the cheeky nature of Amy's diary -- individually, they're amusing; together, they're a riot.

The outsized comedy's purpose is in service of Gone Girl's ultimate metaphor, which is that it's...

...An Honest Examination of Marriage
It's crucial that even when we learn that Amy's diary was all a part of her plan to frame Nick, it's emphasized that the early entries are truthful.  Those confirm that Nick and Amy were once a real, genuine couple.  There was a fire to their relationship, and they seemed truly convinced that they weren't like the other marriages they knew.  But then they crack and tear in the same ways lots of people do: he loses his job, she loses her job, he spends a little too much money, she's forced to move away from her parents.  And on and on and on.

People always talk about how marriage takes work and that it's full of compromises, but usually in a way that emphasizes how it makes you a better, fuller person at the end of the day.  Gone Girl examines the flipside of that viewpoint.  It's about how much of yourself you can lose in meeting the other person halfway.  You're tweaking yourself to be the person your mate wants until you're somebody else entirely, somebody you may not even like anymore.

It's easy to get caught up in the cat-and-mouse plotting and the surrounding media blitz in the film and lose what's at the center of it all.  The straw that broke the camel's back is that Nick cheated on Amy and it hurt her.  Yeah, she may be a psycho, but he messed up too.  That's what makes Gone Girl so brilliant: Nick is not just the victim in this situation.  He contributed to the downfall of their marriage.  It's no coincidence that Nick going on national television to admit that he's a bad guy is the moment that Amy has her turnaround and decides to go back to him.  (Nick is doing it mostly for show, but a part of him is also coming to terms with the fact that some of this ordeal is his fault too.)  So Amy has to improvise and come up with a new outgrowth of her plan, deciding to kill Desi (Neil Patrick Harris), the ex-boyfriend with whom she's hiding, and return to North Carthage as if she has escaped a kidnapping.  Nick can't even leave, because the media is convinced of Amy's story, and abandoning his wife after she's been through so much supposed strife would turn him into a villain all over again.

Though the two of them getting back together and putting on a show for the cameras is played for laughs, it's also a devastating metaphor.  Not all couples who are unhappy decide to make a run for it.  They stick it out for no other reason than that they feel trapped and without other options (in this case, Nick actually is kind of trapped).  You've done wrong and the other person has done wrong and you've warped each other so much that you're not even sure anybody else would want you.  You stay for the kids (fittingly, Amy reveals that she's pregnant), and you put on a brave, happy face for the public.  Inertia is the only thing keeping you together.

Gone Girl understands that sometimes marriage can be a prison, but hey, at least it's a familiar one.

Friday, October 3, 2014

Pilot Talk 2014: Week 3 of Fall's TV Pilots



Every TV season, networks bring out a new crop of shows, in hopes that they'll be the next big hit.  Pilot Talk is devoted to figuring out whether these shows are worth your time based on the first episode.

A to Z (NBC, Thursdays at 9:30 PM)
More and more, the romantic comedy is breaking free of the boundaries of film and seeping into the world of television, with the likes of The Mindy Project and New Girl (which didn't start out as one, but is now fully entrenched in the genre).  A to Z is just another addition to that trend, telling the story of Andrew (Ben Feldman) and Zelda (Cristin Milioti), and their new-found relationship.  The pilot is full of romantic comedy cliches: a pairing of complete opposites (Zelda = logic and reason, Andrew = hopeless romantic), a quirky job (he works at a dating website), the fated relationship (they saw each other at a concert two years ago).  But every installment in the genre peddles in a few tropes, and A to Z plays to them reasonably well.  The main draw, without a doubt, is Feldman and Milioti.  They're terrific leads with a sparkling, believable chemistry that carries the pilot.  Everything around them though -- from the sidekicks who are given dire material, to the sluggish workplace comedy -- needs some work.  The good news is that these are very fixable problems.  A to Z has a very solid center, it just needs to strengthen things around the edges.
Grade: B-

Bad Judge (NBC, Thursdays at 9:00 PM)
The "Bad [Occupation]" title seems to be a popular naming structure, from Bad Santa to Bad Teacher (the movie) to Bad Teacher (the TV show).  Now we've got Bad Judge, the latest in the line of get-straight-to-the-point titles.  You see, Rebecca Wright (Kate Walsh) is a judge.  But here's the thing: she's also "bad."  That badness manifests itself in the least funny and least interesting ways: unfunny drunken antics, unfunny sexcapades, and unfunny interactions with little kids.  Not much is there to chew on with Bad Judge, it's just so generic.  The pilot is lumpy and unbalanced too.  If it feels like two different episodes smushed together, that's because apparently it was heavily re-cut from its original, somehow more disastrous incarnation.  Are there any bright spots though?  Well, Kate Walsh has a ton of fun with a lame character, it's always nice to see Ryan Hansen pop up on a show, and there were exactly two jokes that I thought were really funny.  That's about it though.
Grade: D+

Gracepoint (Fox, Thursdays at 9:00 PM)
Watching Gracepoint was a weird experience for me.  I've already seen Broadchurch, the 2013 UK show on which this is based, and was quite fond of it (though I didn't like it as much as the critical consensus did).  Not only is the pilot of Gracepoint written by Broadchurch creator Chris Chibnall, but it's also directed by James Strong, who directed the latter's first episode as well.  The result is a nearly shot-for-shot remake, which is kind of bizarre.  It's like Gus Van Sant's Psycho remake if it was directed by the ghost of Alfred Hitchcock instead, or Michael Haneke's Funny Games remake but in the same language as the original.  Even David Tennant returns to play the same character, this time donning a not-always-convincing American accent.  The bad news is that Broadchurch fans might not enjoy having to experience 10 episodes of deja vu.  The good news is that most of America hasn't seen Broadchurch, and Gracepoint is not a bad substitute.  Like its predecessor, the performances on this show are pretty terrific across the board.  If there was one actor whose replacement I was worried about, it was Jodie Whittaker, but Virginia Kull kills it as Beth, the mother of the child who is found dead at the beginning of the episode.  Gracepoint also lays out the tightknit nature of its community just as effectively, underlining how everybody knowing each other makes Danny's murder more shocking and the investigation have higher stakes.  Overall, I'd highly recommend this show to newcomers.  As for Broadchurch fans?  Well, just think of it like a classic play being performed by a new set of actors.
Grade: B

Happyland (MTV, Tuesdays at 11:00 PM)
Let's talk about incest.  It's all anybody wanted to discuss a few months ago when critics watched the pilot of Happyland during the TCA summer press tour, that moment where the main character finds out that the boy she kissed in the previous scene is actually her half-brother.  Based on the tweets I saw from critics, it kind of seemed like they were ganging up on the show's creators, relentlessly pestering them with questions about the incest, barely masked their disgust.  (It certainly didn't help that everybody on the panel did a poor job of answering those questions.)  Now that I've actually seen the pilot, I don't really see what all the vitriol was about.  The reveal itself is a little clumsily handled, but it opens the show up to alot of interesting territory that can be explored.  One of the pressing questions was from critics is, "this is a teen comedy -- why would you decide to put incest in it?," but it's very clear that this show is interested in examining the ways in which people relate to one another, and how that contrasts with the formal definition of those relationships.  The incest angle is just another wrinkle to that fabric.  And let's be honest, on the grand spectrum of Oedipal love, this is pretty lite incest.  (I've told you basically nothing else about this show and I have no regrets.)
Grade: C+

Manhattan Love Story (ABC, Tuesdays at 8:30 PM)
I'm all for a pilot trying to do something different.  And that's what Manhattan Love Story is trying to do with the choice of having the viewer be able to hear the inner thoughts of Dana (Analeigh Tipton) and Peter (Jake McDorman) as they prepare and finally meet up for a blind date.  It's not new -- the UK classic Peep Show does that and takes it a step further by shooting everything from the first person perspective of its two leads -- but it is different.  The problem is that these internal musings don't serve much purpose, lacking insight and comedy.  They're actually a subtractive force instead of an additive one.  By vocalizing Dana and Peter thoughts, the show makes them less likable, reducing them to a trite "he constantly thinks about boobs, she constantly thinks about purses" dichotomy.  In doling out all of these outdated cliches, Manhattan Love Story feels more like a Helen Hunt romcom from the 90s than a comedy for modern times.  Yet it's hard to really get bent out of shape about this show when it's so vanilla.  Unfunny but not aggressively so, misguided but not infuriating.  Manhattan Love Story is just dull, dull, dull.
Grade: C-

Selfie (ABC, Tuesdays at 8:00 PM)
I really want to like Selfie.  It's created by Emily Kapnek, who has written for Parks and Recreation, and has also created solid shows like Suburgatory and As Told By Ginger.  It also stars internet darling Karen Gillan (who proved she could be funny on the most recent season of NTSF:SD:SUV::) and John Cho.  Unfortunately, I don't like Selfie very much, at least not the pilot.  The biggest problem is that it's not very funny, and actively annoying at certain points.  I do like that it's one of the first television attempts to genuinely examine the way we engage with technology and social media by centering around Eliza Dooley (Gillan), an image-obsessed sales rep.  But so far, it's not a very nuanced or amusing attempt.  There's a way to make myopic vapidity funny -- think Cher Horowitz -- but Selfie just isn't quite there yet.  It also feels long and definitely has to be tightened up.  The jokes need to come with a little more zip and maybe they'd land with more success.  Sitcoms rarely start out funny, so that's less worrisome.  What's more cause for concern is the premise -- a riff on Pygmalion and My Fair Lady -- where the concept of Henry (Cho) fixing Eliza feels a little icky.  Kapnek has accumulated enough goodwill to make Selfie worth sticking with, but it's still got a long way to go.
Grade: C

Stalker (CBS, Wednesdays at 10:00 PM)
Apparently, creator Kevin Williamson didn't properly scratch his "women in peril" itch with Fox's execrable The Following.  On that show, he used horrific violence against women as an entertainment and shock factor while trying to pretend that it was a more sophisticated look into the darkness in humanity's soul by adding inane references to Edgar Allan Poe.  Now, like those unstoppable killers he seems to be so enamored with, Williamson is back again with CBS's Stalker, which purports to examine the issue of stalking, but is really just another excuse to show women getting murdered.  And boy, do they ever.  The opening scene of a woman being burned alive is filmed with maximum cruelty, lingering on her terror in an almost fetishistic way.  To balance things out, the pilot includes a subplot about a male being stalked, but not only does it feel like an afterthought, it doesn't have even half of the sadistic glee that the scenes featuring women being preyed upon do.  Still, I was willing to throw this show a D+ for most of the episode because at least it was competently made.  There are a few well-written lines that recall Williamson's better work, some genuinely creepy imagery, and a dependable lead in Maggie Q.  But then it ends with an idiotic, pat conclusion that reinforces its "everybody stalks in their own way!" worldview.  Burn Stalker to the ground.
Grade: F